
| Your Daily Source for Apache News and Information |
|
| Breaking News | Preferences | Contribute | Triggers | Link Us | Search | About |
\n'); } if ( plugin ) { document.write(' '); } else if (!(navigator.appName && navigator.appName.indexOf("Netscape")>=0 && navigator.appVersion.indexOf("2.")>=0)) { document.write(' |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]()
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
"This week we discuss IPSec issues; an FTP client that supports SSL; "owning" Apache; EML extensions; listing of port numbers; connecting a Linux machine to the Internet; and stateful firewalls." "Who should own Apache? I have nobody as the owner and the group, but I'm not sure if this is safe or not...." "I have had a discussion with a colleague about different types of firewalls. He scorned at my mentioning the Linux ipchains and said that ipchains is a stateless firewall, meaning (I figured) that a stateful firewall is more secure since it can trace individual connections instead of individual packets. I can understand the advantage of a stateful firewall for doing things like SSL in a load-balanced environment, but I do not see how it improves security. Would you say that a stateful firewall is a more secure technology (I am not talking about any particular implementation), and if it is, why?" Complete Story Related Stories: |
|
|
No talkbacks posted. |

| About Triggers | Media Kit | Security | Triggers | Login |
|
All times are recorded in UTC. Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds. Powered by Linux 2.4, Apache 1.3, and PHP 4 Legal Notices, Licensing, Reprints, & Permissions, Privacy Policy. |