Your Daily Source for Apache News and Information  
Breaking News Preferences Contribute Triggers Link Us Search About
Apache Today [Your Apache News Source] To

Apache HTTPD Links
The Apache Software Foundation
Apache Module Registry
Apache Project
The Apache FAQ
The Jakarta Project
Apache XML Project
Apache-Perl Integration Project
Apache-Related Projects
The Java Apache Project
PHP Server Side Scripting

Internet News
Internet Investing
Internet Technology
Windows Internet Tech.
Linux/Open Source
Web Developer
ISP Resources
ASP Resources
Wireless Internet
Internet Resources
Internet Lists
Career Resources

Advertising Info
Corporate Info
The June Netcraft Results are Out: Apache Gains Slightly in Market Share
Jun 30, 2001, 16 :12 UTC (6 Talkback[s]) (12187 reads) (Other stories by Kevin Reichard)

The Netcraft Web Server Survey is a survey of Web Server software usage on Internet connected computers. We collect and collate as many hostnames providing an http service as we can find, and systematically poll each one with an HTTP request for the server name.
In the June 2001 survey we received responses from 29,302,656 sites.

Market Share for Top Servers Across All Domains August 1995 - June 2001

Top Servers

Server May 2001 Percent June 2001 Percent Change
Apache 18069603 62.24 18466153 63.02 0.78
Microsoft-IIS 5957240 20.52 5972321 20.38 -0.14
Netscape-Enterprise 1778958 6.13 1768673 6.04 -0.09
Zeus 798745 2.75 810108 2.76 0.01

Active Sites

Developer May 2001 Percent June 2001 Percent Change
Apache 7230089 61.53 7346025 62.42 0.89
Microsoft 3062949 26.07 3076623 26.14 0.07
iPlanet 324722 2.76 273293 2.32 -0.44

iPlanet is the sum of sites running iPlanet-Enterprise, Netscape-Enterprise, Netscape-FastTrack, Netscape-Commerce, Netscape-Communications, Netsite-Commerce & Netsite-Communications.

Microsoft is the sum of sites running Microsoft-Internet-Information-Server, Microsoft-IIS, Microsoft-IIS-W, Microsoft-PWS-95, & Microsoft-PWS.

Platform groupings are here.

Counting computers running the Web


One of the common observations made about the Web Server Survey is that it counts hostnames rather than physical computers, and so is not a suitable metric to indicate hardware installed base or license sales. Technically sophisticated hosting companies can run several thousand sites on a single computer, and the great majority of the world's web sites are located at hosting and co-location companies rather than on peripheral networks.

Building on the operating system detection techniques used by the What's that site running? query and Netcraft's commercial research, we have attempted to address this. Netcraft has developed a technique that, with an error margin, can give an indication of the numbers of actual computers we find on the Web, together with the operating system and web server software used.

By arranging for a number of IP addresses to send packets to us near simultaneously, low level TCP/IP characteristics can be used to work out, within an error margin, if those packets originate from the same computer, by checking for similarities in a number of TCP/IP protocol header fields. To build up sufficient certainty that IP addresses on the same computer have been identified many visits to the sites in the Web Server Survey are necessary, which takes place over a period of over a month.

Round robin DNS, reverse web proxies, some load balancing/failover products like Cisco LocalDirector and BIG-IP and some connection level firewalls hide a number of web servers behind a hostname. A limitation of the technique is that only a single "front" web server will be counted. Additionally with some of these products the operating system detected is that of the "front" device rather than the web server behind.

Error Margins

There are a number of factors that create errors in this survey, the main ones being:
  • Despite making multiple visits, there is still a low probability that two computers will be considered the same by chance similarities in low-level TCP/IP protocol header fields; this leads to under-counting.
  • Some IP addresses do not respond on enough visits for the technique to be applied. This is mainly due to computers or networks being down or badly overloaded on several of the visits, in which case there are uncounted computers; by extrapolating using the IP address/computer ratio for sites running similar software we can roughly correct for this error.
  • If a system changes or upgrades operating system during the course of the survey, which takes over a month to run, and because of some other detailed issues, a computer may be counted more than once; this leads to over-counting, but generally this should be a fairly small effect.

It is difficult to determine a reasonable error bracket for the computer count numbers, especially as the two major errors are in opposite directions, so cancel to some extent. One useful piece of evidence that suggest there are not really large levels of error, is that the average ratio of sites to computers on hosting company networks, is over 10, whereas the ratio of self hosted sites to computers is about 2.

Considering the technique in the abstract we think that error margins world-wide are in the order of ± 10% on IP addresses allocated to hosting companies, where the greatest number of successful comparisons needs to be made by the technique, and in the order of ± 5% on self hosted networks. Note this is in addition to the limitation that we only identify at most one computer per load-balanced website; we cannot quantify the numerical effect of this limitation, but would expect only a minority of web server computers world-wide to use load-balancers at this time, so not causing large-scale distortion of the results.

Netcraft has been performing this survey since February 1999, generally four times a year. The trends since then have been very smooth suggesting there is only a small amount of "random error" in this survey. There could be significant "systematic error" affecting particular groups of web servers more than others, but there are no strong reasons to suppose this would affect particular operating system groups or types of web server significantly more than others world-wide. Studying the quarterly trend results in detail does give us confidence that the error margins in the results are well within the stated ± 10%.


Operating Systems used by Computers running public Internet Web Sites, March 2001

OS group Percentage Composition
Windows 49.2% Windows 2000, NT4, NT3, Windows 95, Windows 98
Linux 28.5% Linux
Solaris 7.6% Solaris 2, Solaris 7, Solaris 8
Other Unix 2.4% AIX, Compaq Tru64, HP-UX, IRIX, SCO Unix, SunOS 4 and others
Other non-Unix 2.5% MacOS, NetWare, proprietary IBM OSs
Unknown 3.6% not identified by Netcraft operating system detector

Microsoft Windows has a significantly higher share of the web when one counts by computer, rather than by host, as in the conventional Web Server Survey. The survey shows 49% of the computers running the web are Windows based; a little more than all of the Unix-like operating systems combined. As some of the 3.6% of computers not identified by Netcraft operating system detector will in reality be Windows systems, it would be fair to say about 50% of public Web Servers world-wide are run on Microsoft operating systems Although Apache running on various Unix systems runs more sites than Windows, Apache is heavily deployed at hosting companies and ISPs who strive to run as many sites as possible on a single computer to save costs. Windows is most popular with end-user and self hosted sites, where the host to computer ratio is much smaller.

Linux is the second most commonly used operating system. Linux has been consistently gaining share since this survey started, but interestingly not significantly to Windows detriment. Operating systems which have lost share have been Solaris and other proprietary operating systems, and to a small degree BSD.

One could characterise this process as Solaris being continually chased further and further up market by Intel based operating systems, with Sun in turn progressively eliminating the other proprietary Unix operating systems. Intel enjoys both the benefits of the boom in freely available Unix software and the ascent of Windows, with competing processors correspondingly marginalised in the web server market.

Sun would reasonably point out that this analysis simply counts the number of computers rather than their cost, and that a $1K Intel machine would count the same as a $1M E10K system, and that while Windows matains its share in Fortune 500 companies, the relative position between Linux and Solaris is approximately reversed in these companies.

The analysis also gives some quantification of the rate at which sites migrate to Windows 2000 from NT. In March 2001, a little over a year after the introduction of the operating system 25% of the computers running Microsoft operating systems are running Windows 2000.

Regional Variations

The results summarised above are from a world-wide perspective and significant variations can occur in regional analyses. Out of 32 countries with at least 0.1% of sites on the web each, Windows computers outnumber Unix-like computers in 22 of them. The countries with the largest proportions of Windows web servers are China, South Africa and Singapore. Countries in which Unix-like operating systems maintain the strongest lead are Poland, Hungary, Japan, Russia and Germany, with Linux strong in Poland and Hungary, and BSD in Russia and Japan. Linux leads Windows in Poland, Hungary, the Czech Republic and Germany, while in Finland, home country of Linus Torvalds, Windows has a tiny lead over Linux!

Fair use, Copyright

Excerpts from this survey may be reproduced if Netcraft and the url are attributed.

Related Stories:
The May Netcraft survey is out: it's an Apache world!(Jun 01, 2001)
The April Netcraft survey is out: Apache on top(Apr 18, 2001)
Apache 2.0.16 released as beta(Apr 09, 2001)
Apache 2.0.15 released as an alpha(Mar 28, 2001)

  Current Newswire:
Apache 2.0.32 beta is available

Everything Solaris: Apache: The Basics

Apache Jakarta James Mailserver v2.0a2 Released

PostgreSQL v7.2 Final Release

Daemon News: Multiple webservers behind one IP address

Zend Technologies launches Zend Studio 2.0

NuSphere first to enable development of PHP web services

Covalent Technologies raises $18 million in venture capital

Apache 1.3.23 released

wdvl: Build Your Own Database Driven Website Using PHP and MySQL: Part 4

 Talkback(s) Name  Date
Well, MS has won this round because it takes at least 5 NT boxes to do the work ...   It takes 5 NT boxes to do what 1 Linux box can do   
  Jun 30, 2001, 23:23:40
It's too early for S/390 mainframes to make much of an impact in the totals, ...   Wonder how S/390 will figure into this?   
  Jul 1, 2001, 15:11:46
... for everybody to talk about how it takes 1 Linux box to handle the work of 1 ...   Now is the time...   
  Jul 1, 2001, 16:11:05
I can imagine MS advocates hapily quoting this, then looking very ashamed when t ...   So MS advocates can't use this bit of news   
  Jul 2, 2001, 06:43:55
It is not fair to count UNIXes and Windowses in one survey,because it's like ...   Buses and cars   
  Jul 2, 2001, 13:52:01
It would be interesting to report on what percentage of webhosts are actually se ...   security.. what percentage are known to have security holes?   
  Jul 26, 2001, 02:58:18
Enter your comments below.
Your Name: Your Email Address:

Subject: CC: [will also send this talkback to an E-Mail address]

See our talkback-policy for or guidelines on talkback content.

About Triggers Media Kit Security Triggers Login

All times are recorded in UTC.
Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds.
Powered by Linux 2.4, Apache 1.3, and PHP 4
Copyright 2002 INT Media Group, Incorporated All Rights Reserved.
Legal Notices,  Licensing, Reprints, & Permissions,  Privacy Policy.